Article Sidebar

Download
Full Text
Statistic
Read Counter : 27 Download : 20

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to identify why lecturers and students use (or do not use) Indonesian Language in the English language teaching-learning processes.


Research methods: The study was conducted at Politeknik Negeri Bali Jembrana, which involved five lecturers and 64 students. The data are from the questionnaire which were analyzed quantitatively by quantifying the result of the questionnaire and finding the final score of the questionnaire. The result of the observation was analyzed qualitatively using the interactive data analysis.


Results and discussion: The lecturers used the Indonesian Language in the teaching and learning process of EFL (English as a Foreign Language) in the form of code-switching, code-mixing, and interpreting, the lecturers use L1 in the teaching and learning process of EFL for instructional purposes, and both the students and the lecturers had a positive attitude toward the use of the Indonesian Language.


Implication: Using L1 in the teaching and learning process of EFL can be done for instructional purposes, but lecturers need to consider students' English level mastery in deciding the use of L1 in the teaching and learning process of EFL.

Keywords

first language, lecturers' attitude, students' attitude, teaching, EFL, tourism

Article Details

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

How to Cite
Mahardika, I. M. O., & Manuaba, I. B. (2024). First Language Use in English Language Teaching for Tourismat Politeknik Negeri Bali Jembrana. Jurnal Bali Membangun Bali, 5(3), 260-274. Retrieved from https://ejournal.baliprov.go.id/index.php/jbmb/article/view/400

References

  1. Al-Nofaie, H. (2010). The Attitudes of Teachers and Students Towards Using Arabic in EFL Classrooms in Saudi Public Schools-A Case Study. Novitas-Royal, 4(1).
  2. Alshammari, M.M. (2011). The use of mother tongue in Saudi EFL classrooms. Journal of International Education Research, 7(4): 95-102.
  3. Al Sharaeai, W. A. A. (2012). Students' Perspectives on the Use of L1 in English Classrooms. Iowa State Uneversity.
  4. Arikunto, S. (2002). Prosedurpenelitian: Suatupendekatanpraktek. Edisirevisi. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
  5. Ary, D. (2002). Introduction to Research in Education. Sixth Edition. NewYork: Wardsworth.
  6. Auerbach, E. (1993). Reexamining English Only in the ESL Classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 9-32.
  7. Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  8. Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  9. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative Research for Education, An introduction to Theory and Methods (Third Edition). USA: Allyn and Bacon.
  10. Chávez, V. (2002). Language, Gender and Violence in Qualitative Research,” International Quarterly of Community Health Education, Vol. 21, Issue 1, 2002.
  11. Cohen, L. (2000). Research Methods in Education. 5th Edition, Routledge Falmer, London.
  12. Elmetwally, E.E. (2012). Students’ and Teachers’ Attitude towards the Use of Learners’ Mother Tongue in English Language Classrooms in UAE public High Schools. Graduate Theses and Dissertation.Retrieved October 31, 2015, from http://bspace.buid.ac.ae/bitstream/1234/182/1/90034.pdf.
  13. Goodwin, A. L. (2011). Professional Development Schools and the professionalization of teaching. In J. E. Neapolitan (Ed.), Taking Stock of Professional Development Schools: What’s Needed Now, National Society for the Study of Education, Vol. 110, Issue 2 (pp. 432-443). NY: Teachers College.
  14. Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching (3rd ed.). Harlow: Longman.
  15. Halliwell, S., & Jones, B. (1991). On Target: Teaching in the Target Language. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.
  16. Howatt, A. (1984). A history of English language teaching. Oxford: OUP.
  17. Hidayati, I. N. (2012).Evaluating the role of L1 in teaching receptive skills and grammar in EFL classes.Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2): 17-32.
  18. Knight, P. T. (1996). Transforming Higher Education. Buchingham, Society for Research into Higher Education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  19. Krashen, S.D. (1988) Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Prentice Hall, New York.
  20. Kurnia, S. (2011). Analysis of English Syntactic Structure of Coordination in “Cover Story” Column Articles in Campus Asia Magazine. Unpublished Research Paper. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
  21. Lado, R. (1957) Linguistics across Cultures: Applied Linguistics and Language Teachers. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
  22. Littlewood, W. (1984) Foreign and Second Language Learning: Language Acquisition Research and Its Implications for the Classroom. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  23. Ludvi, A.S. (2015). Students’ Perception toward The Use of L1 (Indonesia) in English Classroom. Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.
  24. Manara, C. (2007). The use of L1 support: Teachers’ and students’ opinions and practices in an Indonesian context. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 4(1): 145-178.
  25. Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  26. Morgan, D. (1988) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, London.
  27. Rike, N. (2014). Hubungan DukunganSosial Suami dengan Tingkat Kecemasan Ibu yang Memiliki Anak Retardasi Mental di SLBN 2 Padang. Skripsi. Universitas Andalas.
  28. Rianto, Y. (2007). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Surabaya: UNESA University Prees.
  29. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  30. Phillipson, R. (1992) Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  31. Sadeharju, T. (2012). Language choice in EFL teaching: Student teachers’ perception. Unpublished thesis. University of Jyväskylä.
  32. Tsukamoto, M. (2012).Students’ perception of teachers’ language use in an EFL classroom.OsakaJogakuin Research Repository, 8, 143-154.