Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This research aims to investigate and implement an anthropological methodology for achieving sustainable eco-tourism in Bali, Indonesia.


Research methods: This qualitative method used involves a thorough examination and comparison of diverse scholarly works, case studies, and relevant texts. The qualitative comparative analysis provides a robust framework for interpreting the complex interplay of ideas, perspectives, and contextual factors embedded in the literature building upon and expanding the understanding of the subject matter within the broader academic discourse.


Results and discussion: The research underscores the critical issues of water supply, waste management, and infrastructure development in Bali. Sustainable solutions, including cultural inclusion, eco-friendly housing, and natural supplements, are proposed to alleviate these challenges.


Implications: The results signify a crucial step towards fostering environmental conservation and responsible tourism practices in this popular destination.

Keywords

anthropological methodology, sustainable eco-tourism, environmental conservation, Tri Hita Karana approach

Article Details

How to Cite
Sonawane, S. V., & Wijaya, I. N. C. (2024). Immersive Anthropological Methodology towards Sustainable Ecotourism: A Case Study of Bali, Indonesia . Jurnal Bali Membangun Bali, 5(2), 110-116. https://doi.org/10.51172/jbmb.v5i2.365

References

  1. Alemu, M. M. (2016). Sustainable Land Management. Journal of Environmental Protection, 07(04), 502–506. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2016.74045.
  2. Anjum, R., & Wani, D. B. (2021). The Concept of Ecological Balance and Environmental Conservation: An Islamic Perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal, November. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3870765.
  3. Arsana, I. G. N. K., Dharma, I. G. B. S., Yekti, M. I., & I Putu Gustave Suryantara, P. (2022). Status of Raw Water Management Sustainability Based on Local Wisdom on Rural Water Supply in Bali, Indonesia. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10(7), 3118–3134. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2022.100725.
  4. Becken, S. (2013). Developing a Framework for Assessing Resilience of Tourism Sub-Systems to Climatic Factors. Annals of Tourism Research, 43, 506–528. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.06.002.
  5. Brooks, J., Reyes-García, V., & Burnside, W. (2018). Re-examining Balinese Subaks through The Lens Of Cultural Multilevel Selection. Sustainability Science, 13(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0453-1.
  6. D’Amato, D., Droste, N., Allen, B., Kettunen, M., Lähtinen, K., Korhonen, J., Leskinen, P., Matthies, B. D., & Toppinen, A. (2017). Green, circular, bio economy: A Comparative Analysis of Sustainability Avenues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 716–734. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.053.
  7. Norken, I. N., Suputra, I. K., & Arsana, I. G. N. K. (2016). Challenges to the Conservation of Subak System as World Cultural Heritage in Bali. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology B, 6(4), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6264/2016.04.001.
  8. Lenzen, M., Sun, Y.-Y., Faturay, F., Ting, Y.-P., Geschke, A., & Malik, A. (2018). The carbon Footprint of Global Tourism. Nature Climate Change, 8(6), 522–528. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0141-x.
  9. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Source Book, Edition. 3 Sage Publications. Tousand Oaks, Carlifornia, 6.
  10. Parashar, A., Indolia, U., Vishwavidyalaya, D. S., Chandel, P. S., & Vishwavidyalaya, D. S. (2023). Responsible Tourism: a Roadmap for Sustainable and Comprehensive Regional. May, 0–9.
  11. Pereira, T., & dos Anjos, S. J. G. (2023). Corporate Social Responsibility as Resource for Tourism Development Support. Tourism Planning and Development, 20(5), 769–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2021.1873834.
  12. Pickel-Chevalier, S., & Ketut, B. (2016). Towards Sustainable Tourism in Bali. Mondes Du Tourisme, Hors-série, 0–21. https://doi.org/10.4000/tourisme.1187.
  13. Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three Pillars of Sustainability: In Search of Conceptual Origins. Sustainability Science, 14(3), 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5.
  14. Sanjaya, P. P. O. M., Adnyana, I. W., & Muka, I. K. . (2022). Tri Hita Karana: A Contemporary Sculpture Creation. Journal of Aesthetics, Creativity and Art Management, 1(2), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.59997/jacam.v1i2.1847.
  15. Sharma, K. K. (2021). Indian culture: A Modality for Wellbeing. Journal of English Language and Literature, 7(April).
  16. Sumantri, I. K., Sudana, I. P., Dwirandra, A. A. N. B., & Wirajaya, I. G. A. (2022). Sustainability Business Practices Based on Tri Hita Karana and Its Accountability. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6(on), 631–654. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v6nS1.2109.
  17. UNWTO. (2019). Guidelines for Development of Gastronomy Tourism.
  18. Wendri, I. G. M., Mawati, M., Elistyawati, I. A., & Sudarmini, N. M. (2021). Human Resource Development Model for Wellness Products to Support Sustainable Tourism in Sangkan Gunung Village, Karangasem Regency, Bali Province. Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Science and Technology on Social Science (ICAST-SS 2020), 544, 368–375. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210424.071.
  19. Windia, W., & Sedana, G. (2014). Water and Subak Irrigation System in Bali.
  20. Wulan, I. G. A. M. N., & Karja, I. W. (2023). The Kalpika Natha Mascot Dance: A Substance of Anthropological, Semiotic, and Aesthetic Studies. Journal of Aesthetics, Creativity and Art Management, 2(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.59997/jacam.v2i2.2804.