Article Sidebar

Download
Full Text
Statistic
Read Counter : 805 Download : 1854

Main Article Content

Abstract

 Millennials generations are valuable assets owned by the Indonesian people. The number of generations reaching approximately 35% now makes every politician interested in getting feedback from this generation. The millennial generation currently has a very broad momentum, one of which is in terms of political participation in Indonesia. The activity of this millennial generation is able to change the direction and pace of Indonesian politics towards being identical to this generation's habit. His appearance to be active in political participation today has changed Indonesia's political paradigm a lot. Young figures with very different communication styles compared to their predecessor's style make this millennial generation has its own distinctive characteristics and colors in the Indonesian public sphere. Besides that Indonesia, which is currently entering the gate of industrial revolution 4.0, must certainly adapt to the pace of the era and change the paradigm of a very fast generation especially in 2030 Indonesia will experience a demographic bonus, so that readiness and maturity in the political world for the millennial generation is very important to prepare since early. 

Keywords

participation, millennial generation, national politics.

Article Details

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

How to Cite
Candranegara, I. M. W., Mahardhika, I. P. E., & Mirta, I. W. (2018). Partisipasi Generasi Milenial dalam Kancah Politik Nasional 2019. Jurnal Bali Membangun Bali, 2(1), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.51172/jbmb.v2i1.36

References

  1. Ali, Hasanuddin; Purwandi, Lili; Nugroho, Harry; Ekoputri, Anastasya; Halim, Taufuqul. 2017.
  2. “The Urban Middle-Class Millenials Indonesia: Financial And Online Behavior”. Laporan
  3. Hasil Penelitian. Jakarta: Alvara Research Center. Diakses dari website: http://alvarastrategic.com/wp-content/uploads/whitepaper/The-Urban-Middle-Class-Millenials.pdf,
  4. 10 Agustus 2018.
  5. Ali, Hasanudin. 2016. “3M, Kunci Kemenangan dalam Pilgub DKI Jakarta 2017”. Diakses dari
  6. websitedari:http://www.republika.co.id/berita/jurnalismewarga/wacana/16/10/05/oekh2u
  7. 408-3m-kunci-kemenangandalam-pilgub-dki-jakarta-2017, pada 11 Agustus 2018.
  8. Alvara Research Centre. 2014. “Generasi Millennial Indonesia: Tantangan dan Peluang
  9. Pemuda Indonesia”. Diakses dari website: http://alvara-strategic.com/generasimillennial-indonesia-tantangan-dan-peluang-pemuda-indonesia/, pada 11 April 2018.
  10. Back, H., Teorell, J; Westholm, A. 2011. “Explaining Modes of Participation: a Dynamic Test of
  11. Alternative Rational Choice Models”. Journal Scandinavian Political Studies, 34(1),
  12. 2011, 74–97.
  13. Bourne, P.A. 2010. “Modelling Political Trust in a Developing Country Current”. Research
  14. Journal of Social Sciences 2(2): 84-98.
  15. BPS. 2010. “Sensus Penduduk 2010”. Diakses dari website:
  16. https://www.bps.go.id/news/2011/11/01/5/bps-telah-merilis-hasil-sensus-penduduk2010.html, pada 1 April 2018.
  17. Cates, S. V. 2014. “The Young and The Restless: Why Don’t Millennials Join Unions?”
  18. International Journal of Business and Public Administration, 11(2), 2014, 107- 119.
  19. Dahrendorf R. 2003. “The Challenge for Democracy”. Journal of Democracy. 14 (4) 2003.
  20. Dewey, Melvil. 2011. Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index. 23rd ed (Joan S.
  21. Mitchell, Julianne Beall, Rebecca Green, Giles Martin, and Michael Panzer, eds).
  22. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC.
  23. Dimitriou, C.K; Blum, S.C. 2015. “An Exploratory Study of Greek Millenials in The Hotel
  24. Industry: How Do They Compare to Other Generations?” International Journal of Global
  25. Business, 8(1), 2015, 62- 92.
  26. EACEA (Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency). 2012. “Political participation
  27. and EU citizenship: Perceptions and behaviors of young people”. Evidence from
  28. Eurobarometer surveys. European Commission.
  29. Estok M, Nevitte N; Cowan, G. 2002. The Quick Count and Election Observation. Washington:
  30. NDI.
  31. Folkerts, J., Lacy, S., Larabee, A. 2008. The Media in Your Life: An Introduction to Mass
  32. Communication (4th ed.) Boston: Pearson Cavazza, F. 2012Education Inc.
  33. Gagnier, Christina. 2008. “Democracy 2.0: Millennial-Generated Change to American
  34. Governance”. National Civic Review, Fall 2008, Vol.97 (3), p.32.
  35. Gilman, Hollie Russon, Elizabeth Stokes. 2014. The Civic and Political Participation of
  36. Millennials and Millennials Rising. @Newamerica.
  37. Glasow, Priscilla A. 2014. Fundamentals of Survey Research Methodology. Washington C3
  38. Center McLean, Virginia: Mitre.
  39. Green, Rebecca; Huang, Xiaoli. 2013. “Classification of Digital Content, Media, and Device
  40. Types”. OCLC Online Library Computer Center, Inc dan Sun Yat-Sen University.
  41. Diakses dari website: http://www.iskouk.org>files>GreenPaper pada 17 April 2018.
  42. Haste, H.; Hogan, A. .2006. “Beyond conventional civic participation, beyond the moral-political
  43. divide: Young people and contemporary debates about citizenship”. Journal of Moral
  44. Education, 35(4), 2006, 473-493.
  45. Howe, N; Strauss, W. 1991. Generations: the history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. New
  46. York City: William Morrow Paperbacks.
  47. Howe, N, Strauss, W. 2000. Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. New York: Vintage.
  48. Idrus, N., Ng, P.K.; Jee, K.S. 2014. “Sustaining Quality in Higher Education in Southeast Asia
  49. Through Understanding Generational Changes”. Journal of Applied Sciences, 14(16)
  50. 2014, 1819- 1827. doi: 10.3923/jas.2014.1819.1827.
  51. JakPat App. 2015. “Preferensi Politik Generasi Millennial”. Dipublikasikan pada 30 September
  52. 2015.
  53. Katz, E; Blumer J. G.; Gurevitch, M. 1974. “Utilization of Mass Communication by The
  54. Individual”, dalam J.G. Blumer dan E. Katz (eds), The Uses of Mass Communication.
  55. Baverly Hills: Sage.
  56. Kilber, J., Barclay, A; Ohmer, D. 2014. “Seven Tips for Managing Generation Y”. Journal of
  57. Management Policy and Practice. 15: 4, 80-9.
  58. Kupperschmidt, B.R. 2000. “Multigenerational Employees: Strategies for Effective
  59. Management”. The Health Care Manager, 19(1), 65-76.
  60. Liputan6. 2016. “Pentingnya Partisipasi Politik Generasi Y di Media Sosial”. Diakses dari
  61. website: https://www.liputan6.com/showbiz/read/2510827/pentingnya-partisipasi-politikgenerasi-y-di-media-sosial pada 13 Agustus 2018.
  62. Little, Ben. 2009. “The Millennial Generation and Politics”. Journal of Politics and Culture, July
  63. 2009, Issue 42, pp.119-128. 42, pp.119-12.
  64. Lyons, S. 2004. “An exploration of generational values in life and at work”. ProQuest
  65. Dissertations and Theses, 441-441. Diakses dari website:
  66. http://ezproxy.um.edu.my/docview/305203456?accountid=28930 pada 10 Agustus
  67. 2018.
  68. Martin, C. A; Tulgan, B. 2002. Managing the Generational Mix. Amherst, MA: HRD Press.
  69. Morissan. 2016. “Tingkat Partisipasi Politik dan Sosial Generasi Muda”. Jurnal Visi Komunikasi,
  70. Volume 15, No.01, Mei 2016: 96-113 102.
  71. Pew Research Center. 2014. “Millennials in Adulthood: Detached from Institutions, Networked
  72. with Friends”.
  73. Pirie, M; Worcester, R.M. 1998. The Millennium Generation. London: Adam Smith Institute.
  74. Putra, Yanuar Surya. 2016. “Teori Perbedaan Generasi”. Jurnal Makarti Vol.9 No.18, Desember
  75. 2016. Diakses dari website:
  76. http://jurnal.stieama.ac.id/index.php/ama/article/viewFile/142/133, pada 15 April 2018.
  77. Roebuck, D.B., Smith, D.N; Haddaoui, T. E. 2013. “Cross-Generational Perspectives on WorkLife Balance and Its Impact on Women’s Opportunities for Leadership in The
  78. Workplace”. Advancing Women in Leadership, 33, 52- 62.
  79. Sandfort, Melissa H; Jennifer G Haworth. 2002. “Whassup? A Glimpse into the Attitudes and
  80. Beliefs of the Millennial Generation”. Journal of College and Character, 3:3, DOI:
  81. 10.2202/1940-1639.1314.
  82. Schullery, N.M. 2013. “Workplace Engangement and Generational Differences in Values.
  83. Business Communication Quarterly”, 76(2), 252- 265. doi: 10.1177/1080569913476543
  84. Tapscott, Don. 2013. Grown Up Digital: Yang Muda yang Mengubah Dunia. Jakarta: Gramedia
  85. Pustaka Utama.
  86. Teorell, J; Torcal, M; Montero, J.R. 2007. “Political Participation: Mapping the Terrain”. Dalam J.
  87. W. Deth., J. R. Montero & A. Westholm (Eds). Citizenship and Involvement in European
  88. Democracies: A Comparative Analysis. London and New York: Routledge.
  89. West, Richard; Lynn H. Turner. 2008. Pengantar Teori Komunikasi: Analisis dan Aplikasi (Buku
  90. 2) (Edisi 3). Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
  91. Young, S.J. et al. 2013. “Generational Differences and Job Satisfaction in Leisure Services”.
  92. Managing Leisure, 18(2) 2013, 152- 170. doi: 10.1080/13606719.2013.752213.